Design of an IoT-Based Smart Pole for Detecting Manipulation of Plantation Boundary Markers

Authors

  • Alwansyah Muhammad Mahardhika Endrawan Politeknik Elektronika Negeri Surabaya Author
  • Mohd. Syafrudin Politeknik Elektronika Negeri Surabaya Author
  • Ali Husein Alasiry Politeknik Elektronika Negeri Surabaya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.68129/jeis.v1i2.10

Keywords:

IoT, Smart pole, Boundary marker monitoring, GNSS, LoRa, HMC5883L

Abstract

Boundary markers are vulnerable to displacement and manipulation, while conventional inspection methods are unable to provide real-time monitoring. This study proposes an Internet of Things (IoT)-based Smart Pole system integrating a uBlox NEO-M8N GNSS module, HMC5883L magnetometer, LoRa EBYTE E32 communication, SIM7600G-H cellular gateway, and a solar-powered subsystem for autonomous boundary marker monitoring. System performance was evaluated through sensor accuracy, communication reliability, and integrated testing. Results showed that the GPS module achieved an average positioning error of 1.60 m (89.33% accuracy), while the HMC5883L achieved an average orientation error of 3.11%, with a maximum MAE of 1.70° and RMSE of 2.05°. The LoRa EBYTE E32 achieved an average PDR of 97.75% with 2.25% packet loss, whereas the SIM7600G-H gateway achieved a 97.0% success rate with 3.0% communication error. The solar subsystem, consisting of a 30 W photovoltaic panel and a 12 V 7.5 Ah SLA battery, provided stable autonomous operation. Integrated testing confirmed reliable detection of displacement and orientation changes, real-time dashboard visualization, and Telegram alert delivery. These results demonstrate that the proposed Smart Pole is a reliable and energy-autonomous solution for real-time plantation boundary marker monitoring.

References

[1] A. Al-Fuqaha, M. Guizani, M. Mohammadi, M. Aledhari, and M. Ayyash, “Internet of Things: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications,” IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 2347–2376, Fourthquarter 2015, doi: 10.1109/COMST.2015.2444095.

[2] H. Hendry and D. Manongga, “Implementation of multi-node sensor data delivery using the master-slave method in LoRa communication,” J. Technol. Informatics Eng., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 117–137, 2024, doi: 10.51903/jtie.v3i2.179.

[3] A. J. M. Hutagalung, I. K. Sjamsudin, and D. P. Hutabarat, “IoT-based parking monitoring system using magnetometer as the sensor,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 794, no. 1, Art. no. 012134, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/794/1/012134.

[4] C. Chen et al., “Characterization of basic physical properties of Sb₂Se₃ and its relevance for photovoltaics,” Front. Optoelectron., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 18–30, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s12200-017-0702-z.

[5] F. Amaral, E. Matia, A. O. Júnior, M. Zorawski, J. Q. Queiroz, and P. Leitão, “A learning module to design printed circuit boards for IoT-based devices,” in Proc. V Workshop Disruptive Information and Communication Technologies for Innovation and Digital Transformation, 2023, pp. 13–29, doi: 10.14201/0AQ03371329.

[6] F. P. Syahrani, H. K. Saputra, S. Anori, W. Agustiarmi, F. T. Ayasrah, and P. V. Thanh, “IoT-enabled smart fence: Remote security and monitoring using NodeMCU ESP32 and Blynk,” J. Hypermedia Technol.-Enhanced Learn., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–15, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.58536/j-hytel.158.

[7] F. Y. Zulkifli, E. Halimsurya, M. Ayyasy, F. Luthfi, and I. Alinursafa, “IoT-based vehicle monitoring system on LoRa network: Addressing community needs in Indonesia,” Int. J. Electr., Comput. Biomed. Eng., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 179–193, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.62146/ijecbe.v2i2.46.

[8] G. Oku Topal, M. F. Karabulut, N. O. Aykut, and B. Akpınar, “Performance of low-cost GNSS equipment in monitoring of horizontal displacements,” Survey Rev., vol. 55, no. 393, pp. 536–545, 2023, doi: 10.1080/00396265.2023.2179910.

[9] M. Babiuch et al., “Design and implementation of ESP32-based IoT devices,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 15, Art. no. 6739, 2023, doi: 10.3390/s23156739.

[10] B. Akpınar and S. Özarpacı, “Monitoring horizontal displacements with low-cost GNSS systems using relative positioning: Performance analysis,” Appl. Sci., vol. 14, no. 9, Art. no. 3634, 2024, doi: 10.3390/app14093634.

[11] K. Hansen, C. Breyer, and H. Lund, “Status and perspectives on 100% renewable energy systems,” Energy, vol. 175, pp. 471–480, May 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.03.092.

[12] K. Mekki, E. Bajic, F. Chaxel, and F. Meyer, “A comparative study of LPWAN technologies for large-scale IoT deployment,” ICT Express, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–7, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.icte.2017.12.005.

[13] S. Ogutcu, S. Alcay, H. Duman, B. N. Ozdemir, and C. Konukseven, “Static and kinematic PPP-AR performance of low-cost GNSS receiver in monitoring displacements,” Adv. Space Res., vol. 72, no. 11, pp. 4795–4808, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2023.09.025.

[14] M. Centenaro, L. Vangelista, A. Zanella, and M. Zorzi, “Long-range communications in unlicensed bands: The rising stars in the IoT and smart city scenarios,” IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 60–67, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1109/MWC.2016.7721743.

[15] N. Wielgocka, T. Hadas, A. Kaczmarek, and G. Marut, “Feasibility of using low-cost dual-frequency GNSS receivers for land surveying,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 6, Art. no. 1956, 2021, doi: 10.3390/s21061956.

[16] J. Paziewski, R. Sieradzki, J. Rapinski, D. Tomaszewski, K. Stepniak, J. Geng, and G. Li, “Integrating low-cost GNSS and MEMS accelerometer for precise dynamic displacement monitoring,” Measurement, vol. 242, Art. no. 115798, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2024.115798.

[17] N. Nitta, F. Wu, J.-T. Lee, and G. Yushin, “Li-ion battery materials: Present and future,” Mater. Today, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 252–264, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2014.10.040.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
A. M. M. Endrawan, M. Syafrudin, and A. H. Alasiry, “Design of an IoT-Based Smart Pole for Detecting Manipulation of Plantation Boundary Markers”, J. Electr. Intell. Syst., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 33–40, Sep. 2026, doi: 10.68129/jeis.v1i2.10.

Most read articles by the same author(s)